• home

Build a 12v to 5v DC high efficiency SMPS buck converter using 34063 IC

This project converts 12v DC to a regulated 5v DC at up to 1.8 amps, suitable for driving a tablet computer from a 12v car battery in a power blackout etc.

The circuit for this buck converter is nothing original, basically it is the circuit from the 34063 IC datasheet, and all I did was to use an external PFET instead of the external PNP transistor shown in the datasheet. The external PFET allows currents up to a few amps at good efficiency, however I have used hard current limiting at 1.8A for safety and good performance in this prototype.

Energy conversion efficiency is very high due mainly to the choice of external components used with the cheap 34063 SMPS IC.

Build a 12v to 5v DC high efficiency SMPS buck converter using 34063 IC


 PCB layout.
The prototype was tested in hardware, please excuse the messiness. The layout is far from ideal, I did it this way to allow easy swapping of parts and just to be lazy, to save the effort of making a PCB. However it still works pretty good, and a proper PCB would improve performance a little bit.

PFET choice.
I did not have a lot of PFETs in my parts box so I used a 100v 8A rated part. This was an SMD PFET so I just tacked it on the bottom of the PCB. It is efficient enough to not need a heatsink even at 5v 1.5A continuous output. The PFET I used was not ideal, its "Rds on" value is about 0.3v at 1.5A (0.2 ohms) which is too high and costs efficiency. Going to a 50v >20A PFET with an RDS <0.1 ohms or <0.05 ohms would give a noticable increase in efficiency.

Schottky diode choice.
I used a TO-220 60v dual 10A schottky diode pack (total 20A). This is a no-brainer, although this is overkill these diodes are only $1-$2 and can also be pulled for free from any old PC PSU and most commercial SMPS supplies. Besides the safety of being very large and over-rated, the main benefit is these diodes have a very low forward voltage drop of <0.3v at 1.5A or 2A and this equates to reduced losses (more efficiency).

Inductor choice.
This is just a commercial "3 amp" 24mm total diameter inductor/choke available from hobby suppliers like Altronics Australia. I think it is a 220uH or 330uH value, but sorry I lost the paperwork.  A few other powdered-iron toroid inductors were tried and it is not that critical. It has 51 turns of 1.0mm diameter wire if that helps. The inductor measured 0.32mV at exactly 1A DC, so DC resitance was measured at 32 milliohms.

Build a 12v to 5v DC high efficiency SMPS buck converter using 34063 IC


Schematic and operation.
Sorry for the hand-drawn schematic! As you can see the circuit is minimum parts. It uses just two resitors to drive the PFET from the IC (same as the datasheet), this is not ideal but was done to test the concept and see if a PFET can be driven as easily as the PNP transistor normally is. PFET turnon is good at 0.07uS, but turnoff is not great taking 0.8uS. This costs about 1-2% efficiency. The 560 ohm resistor could be reduced to speed up the turnoff, but this would increase losses in that resistor so it is a tradeoff.

34063 SMPS IC.
The 34063 IC does all the clever stuff, mainly it regulates voltage at 1.25v on VFB pin5. Because of the 6k8:2k2 voltage divider on the output, this gives very close to 5v, I actually saw about 5.01v-4.99v Vout in testing, very nice.

Max current limit resistor.
The resistor between Vin and pin7 sets the max inductor current limiting, this was set by me to roughly 0.18 ohms to give 1.8A current limiting. (Imax = 0.32v / R = 0.32v/0.18 = 1.78A). The current limit is best at slightly above the max required current. This gives better safety and also helps stabilise oscillation.

Caps etc.
CT used the datasheet value of 1nF. That gave oscillator value of 26.2kHz measured on pin3 (with no load), however the whole circuit usually operated at 29-33kHz because of the way the regulation works in the IC. The filter caps; 680uF on the input and 1000uF on the output were chosen to be "good enough". Output ripple was approx 25-30mV which is fine.

Measured efficiency!

Vin    Iin   Pin        Vout  Iout   Pout      Eff %    
12.5v 670mA 8.375W 4.99 1.53A 7.63W 91.1%
12.5v 430mA 5.375W 5.00 1.00A 5.00W 93.0%
12.5v 210mA 2.625W 5.00 0.50A 2.50W 95.2%

Note! Readings were taken from meters with only 2 decimal point resolution and were not lab grade accuracy, so there may be a couple of percent error in readings.

Calculating efficiency (at 1.5A output).
The static power losses were seen on the scope and can be calculated;

PFET Rds on period loss = 0.3v / 12.5v = 2.4% loss

DIODE Vf off period loss = 0.28v * 1.53A * 0.56 offduty = 240mW = 2.8% loss

Inductor resistance loss = 1.53A squared * 0.032 ohms = 75mW = 0.9% loss

560 ohm resistor loss = 10.5v squared / 560 * 44% onduty = 87mW = 1.0% loss

Total static losses at 1.53A output = 7.1%
Calculated other (switching) losses = 100% - 91.1% - 7.1% = 1.8%



Scope current L1 inductor (on period) at 5v 1.5 amps.
Above is the on period current through the PFET and L1 inductor. As it is a PFET this is inverted so the pointy bit at the bottom is the max current, the top is zero current. At 1.5A and 32kHz the SMPS is very stable, as switching period is reduced becuase the peaks just hit the 0.32v max current limit set by my choice of 0.18 ohm resistor. (However voltage regulation is still the main regulation).

Duty cycle is about 44%, and current ripple in the inductor is nice and low with inductor current averaging 1.5A (ripple of 0.56A, between 1.22A and 1.78A). The noise spikes I suspect are from from my messy PCB with power and load wires everywhere and scope leads laying around next to the PCB and wiring.




Scope current L1 inductor at 5v 1.0 amps.
Same thing but at 1A. Frequency dropped a bit, closer to the 34063 oscillator freq of 26.2kHz, but still (just) triggering on the max current peaks. Current ripple now larger from approx 0.5A to 1.6A (average output 1A). Timing is still 20uS/hdiv but says 40uS on the screen as I had zoomed my h-axis (sorry).



Scope current L1 inductor at 5v 0.5 amps.
Here the L1 current has gone "discontinuous" meaning the L1 current is reduced to zero during the end of the off period, and has to start from 0 amps again during every on period. Typical of the regulation system used in a 34063 IC, the timing will "stutter" as needed to maintain Vout regulation at a steady 5.0v. This does not matter and the 34063 can be quite energy efficiency when "stuttering" in discontinuous mode like this. At less than 0.5 amps the stuttering can become very erratic looking, but this is all normal.



PFET drain/source voltage (main switching waveform).
(The PFET on period is the top of the waveform). Above you can see the PFET turnon (through a 10 ohm resistor) is nice and fast, It was about 0.07uS turnon time. However the turnoff is poor, because the turnoff is from a 560 ohm resistor and is slow at 0.8uS. This costs significant efficiency.

Using an external digital driver (like a 12v CMOS digital buffer/inverter chip?) to drive the PFET would improve turnoff time a lot and increase efficiency, but this was a test of using the simple datasheet example circuit with an external PFET (instead of the suggested external PNP) and as proof of concept it still works well enough.



5v DC output showing voltage ripple.
Because it is a switching regulator there will always be some ripple on the DC output voltage. This is shown when running at 5v 1.5A and the ripple is typical and acceptable enough at 30-35mV.

Improving efficiency.
This circuit was thrown together very quickly to show how to use a cheap common 34063 IC to get a high efficiency supply from 12v->5v DC at 0-1.5A or so. If you want to invest some effort it can be improved further;

1. My PFET is not a good choice, using a better PFET will give an easy 1% more efficiency, and would be the first choice.

2. The inductor is just an ordinary "off the shelf" type. A properly selected inductor or a good core hand wound for best performance could allow lower operating frequency and less current ripple, and maybe less DC ohms, and maybe pick up another 0.5% efficiency or so. (For lower operating freq CT should also be increased to 1.2nF or 1.5nF etc).

3. The PFET turnoff is too slow. Adding a cheap digital buffer IC could pick up 0.8-1.2% efficiency there from reduced switching losses and reduced loss from the 560 ohm resistor.

4. My PCB has very thin long tracks. Using a well designed PCB with thick short tracks for the main current paths might save 30 milliohms and give maybe 0.5% or more efficiency.

Bill of materials.
* 34063 SMPS 8pin IC (Fairchild/ON Semi/AIS etc, ie MC34063A or NCV34063A).
* 8pin IC socket (optional).
* PFET, rated more than double the input voltage and a few times the desired output current, preferably well under 0.1 ohm Rds on.
* Inductor L1 is a powdered iron toroid of 20-30 mm diameter, with thick wire >1.0mm preferred, 3A rated for a 1.5A capable supply. Value in the 150-470uH range, you may need to try a couple of different types. Ideally current ripple will be <50% at full output current.
* Schottky TO-220 dual 10A or dual 16A diode pack. Choose for low forward voltage, most brands are very good, parts can be found in any old PC PSU.
* 470-1000uF 35v electro cap.
* 1000uF 16-25v electro cap (25v will be larger and generally have a longer life).
* CT 1nF 25-50v ceramic or greencap.
* some 1/4W resistors; 560 ohm, 10 ohm, 6k8, 2k2.
* If you need a test load then a large 10W 4.7 ohm resistor will do.

Modifying the circuit for 12v car operation.
This circuit was designed for a car battery, generally 13.8v to 12.0v when running. If used in a car the circuit needs more protection as the Vin might be >15v at times. I would use a 100 ohm resistor instead of the 10 ohm resistor. Also a 13v zener diode across the 560 ohm resistor will add safety for the PFET. A 12v line filter might also be advised, they can be bought from auto stores.

Modifying the circuit for 24v operation.
Use 560 ohms instead of 10 ohms, so it now has two 560 ohm resistors. And again a 13v zener from PFET gate to source pin. With a 24v Vin you should use a higher inductor value and larger inductor core, 470uH and up are recommended.

[b]Modifying the circuit for high output currents.[b]
The circuit is meant for 5v out, 0-1.8A. It will do ok up to 2.5A just by changing the current limit resistor (at 2.5A the resitor should be 0.12 ohms or so).

Currents up to 5 amps or more should be ok, but use a larger inductor core size rated for more than the max amps you need, and again a larger inductor value helps >470uH is good. The diode pack will be fine, but the PFET should be rated for a few times more current than your max current. If needing 5A output I would use a 40-50v 60A TO-220 PFET which are a common size.

Changing output voltage.
Just change the 6k8 resistor, to change the output voltage to something other than 5.0v. Like most SMPS circuits it works best with roughly 2:1 Vin:Vout ratio, if using different ratios then again increasing the inductor value >470uH will help.


Source: http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/showthread.php?t=7885 

High Impedance FET And RF spectrum analyzers



Current models of spectrum analyzers routinely offer frequency responses that begin as low as 10 Hz. When you combine them with 1-Hz or narrower band FFT software, expanded low-frequency performance makes the modern spectrum analyzer an invaluable tool for designing and debugging high-performance analog circuits. Unfortunately, a spectrum analyzer that’s primarily for RF typically presents an input impedance of 50, a heavy load when you apply it to most high impedance analog circuits. You can improvise a some what higher impedance probe by adding a 953 resistor in series with the 50 input, but this approach provides only 1K input impedance and reduces the measured signal by 26 dB. In addition, most RF-spectrum analyzers lack ac coupling, and, thus, any dc-input component directly reaches either the internal terminating resistor or the front-end mixer.



To maintain a 10-Hz, low-frequency response, you must connect a coupling capacitor with a value of at least 2F in series with the 953 input probes. Although oscilloscopes’ input circuits can withstand accidental probe contacts and capacitive-transient overloads, using a low impedance, ac-coupled probe with a spectrum analyzer can lead to destruction of the analyzer’s expensive and possibly hard-to-replace front-end mixer. Although high-impedance probes are commercially available, they’re expensive to purchase and repair. This Design idea offers an alternative: an inexpensive and well-protected unity-gain probe that presents the same input impedance as a basic bench oscilloscope and can drive the spectrum analyzer is 50 input impedances. The probe has a gain of 0 - 0.2 dB at 100 kHz. Input impedance is 1 M, 15 pF, and maximum input is 0.8V p-p. Load impedance is 50, and frequency response is 10 Hz to 200 MHz at 3 dB. Pass band ripple is less than 1 dB p-p.



Input noise at 1 MHz is less than 10 nV/Hz. Distortion for 0.5V p-p input at 10 MHz is less than 75 dBc for second-order distortion and less than 85 dBc for third order. Power requirements are 5V at 16 mA. You can assemble the circuit in the figure readily available and inexpensive components. The circuit’s input presents the same characteristics as a bench oscilloscope 1-M resistance in parallel with 15 pF of capacitance. You can also use this active probe in place of standard 1-to-1 or 10-to-1 oscilloscope probes, thus extending the designs applicability. The back-to-back silicon diodes in the D1 clamp the input signal to plus or minus one forward-voltage drop, which limits signal excursions you apply to the spectrum analyzer’s front end, thus protecting the input mixer from damage due to overloads and ESD.



Because most users employ the probe and spectrum analyzer to measure small-amplitude signals and noise, the limited large-signal response does not affect most applications. High-performance FET input operational amplifier IC1, a Texas Instruments OPA656, provides a voltage gain of two. This configuration yields a bandwidth of approximately 200 MHz the OPA656 can drive 50 back-matched loads for a total load of 100, which results in a 6-dB gain loss for which IC1’s gain of two compensates for a net gain of unity. The OPA656 also introduces lower noise and distortion than that of most commercially available, active FET-based probes.





The probe in the figure fits into a small section of brass hobby tubing. The input connector comprises a small SMA edge-launch connector that you can easily adapt to other connectors, including the BNC and its many accessories. The probe requires 5 and 5V at approximately 18 mA each, which you can obtain from an instruments probe-power connector if available or from a linear supply designed around an ac wall transformer. For best results, use 78L05 and 79L05 voltage regulators to stabilize the supply voltages. Standard miniature 50 coaxial cable connects the probe to the measuring instrument. For the flattest frequency response and uniform gain, terminate the probes output with 50, the circuit requires no dc-output-blocking capacitor

IC LM12 150 Watts high power amplifier


To supply the required voltage to the  amplifier circuit minimum of 7 Volt and a maximum of 24 volts . Incurred sizable ouput for amplifier ic 300 W maximum output.
high power amplifier schematic
Part List :
R1_____________________________________10K
R2_____________________________________10K
R3_____________________________________220K
R4_____________________________________2.2R 2W
C1_____________________________________1uF
C2_____________________________________1000uF
C3_____________________________________68pF
D1_____________________________________BY229
D2_____________________________________BY229
L1_____________________________________4MH
IC1____________________________________LM12